CONSERVATIVE LAWMAKERS GO TO BATTLE WITH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH OVER CHRISTIAN CHARITY TO IMMIGRANTS.
Washington DC - March 21, 2006 - Catholics for Faithful Citizenship is joining over 70 Catholic Diocese nationwide in opposition to the attacks on the Catholic Church leadership and Catholic Social teaching by far right politicians and political operatives. In defense of HR 4437, a bill roundly criticized by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, these lawmakers and their supporters continue to trivialize central teachings of the Catholic Church.
HR 4437 will, among other provisions, criminalize Christian charity as practiced by the Church. The legitimate concerns of Church leadership are answered by shallow promises that, while the law is clear in its language, churches will not be prosecuted. Along with his message of don’t worry be happy, the bill’s co-sponsor and Catholic, U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) has been a vocal critic of the Bishop’s advocacy of Catholic teaching on immigrant justice. In a recent interview with the New York Times, King described the Bishops as “the left wing of the Catholic Church — these are the frustrated social workers.†In recent weeks during an interview on The O'Reilly Factor Representative King was asked if he thought opposition to HR 4437 reflects the “left-wing†politics of the church. King responded, “Yes, I do. I think it's become politically correct within the Catholic Church to take these very liberal positions.†Catholics for Faithful Citizenship would suggest Rep. King review Deuteronomy 24:17-22 and it’s call to care for the alien. Care for the least among us is not a liberal idea; it is one of the principle teachings of our faith. Rep. King should apologize to the millions of Catholics, including the Holy Father who are committed to the rich traditions of Catholic Social Teachings.
GOP Catholic spokespersons Deal Hudson of the Morley Institute and Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of First Things, a conservative journal about religion and public life have both been quick to defend their right-wing ideological counterparts in Congress by questioning Catholic Teaching on immigration. These are the same spokespersons that claim a moral high ground behind Church Teaching when the issue suits them. The Catholic Church’s teaching is clear on the issues of immigration. By what authority do Hudson and Neuhaus challenge this teaching for their political bosses?
“The sponsors of HR 4437 are quick to claim they are champions of values, especially Christian valuesâ€, said Jeff Sinnard, spokesperson for Catholics for Faithful Citizenship. “Someone should remind them of the Christian values of justice and mercy. The hypocrisy of Representatives King and Sensenbrenner on this issue is amazing when you consider how quickly they clothe themselves in religion and cozy up to the Church when it suits their own narrow purposes.â€
On the Web
http://www.justiceforimmigrants.org/
http://www.catholicsforfaithfulcitizenship.org/
Washington DC - March 21, 2006 - Catholics for Faithful Citizenship is joining over 70 Catholic Diocese nationwide in opposition to the attacks on the Catholic Church leadership and Catholic Social teaching by far right politicians and political operatives. In defense of HR 4437, a bill roundly criticized by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, these lawmakers and their supporters continue to trivialize central teachings of the Catholic Church.
HR 4437 will, among other provisions, criminalize Christian charity as practiced by the Church. The legitimate concerns of Church leadership are answered by shallow promises that, while the law is clear in its language, churches will not be prosecuted. Along with his message of don’t worry be happy, the bill’s co-sponsor and Catholic, U.S. Representative Peter King (R-NY) has been a vocal critic of the Bishop’s advocacy of Catholic teaching on immigrant justice. In a recent interview with the New York Times, King described the Bishops as “the left wing of the Catholic Church — these are the frustrated social workers.†In recent weeks during an interview on The O'Reilly Factor Representative King was asked if he thought opposition to HR 4437 reflects the “left-wing†politics of the church. King responded, “Yes, I do. I think it's become politically correct within the Catholic Church to take these very liberal positions.†Catholics for Faithful Citizenship would suggest Rep. King review Deuteronomy 24:17-22 and it’s call to care for the alien. Care for the least among us is not a liberal idea; it is one of the principle teachings of our faith. Rep. King should apologize to the millions of Catholics, including the Holy Father who are committed to the rich traditions of Catholic Social Teachings.
GOP Catholic spokespersons Deal Hudson of the Morley Institute and Rev. Richard John Neuhaus, editor of First Things, a conservative journal about religion and public life have both been quick to defend their right-wing ideological counterparts in Congress by questioning Catholic Teaching on immigration. These are the same spokespersons that claim a moral high ground behind Church Teaching when the issue suits them. The Catholic Church’s teaching is clear on the issues of immigration. By what authority do Hudson and Neuhaus challenge this teaching for their political bosses?
“The sponsors of HR 4437 are quick to claim they are champions of values, especially Christian valuesâ€, said Jeff Sinnard, spokesperson for Catholics for Faithful Citizenship. “Someone should remind them of the Christian values of justice and mercy. The hypocrisy of Representatives King and Sensenbrenner on this issue is amazing when you consider how quickly they clothe themselves in religion and cozy up to the Church when it suits their own narrow purposes.â€
On the Web
http://www.justiceforimmigrants.org/
http://www.catholicsforfaithfulcitizenship.org/
